Nelson's Weblog: culture / emailConversation

The lost art of email conversation

I've been emailing on the Internet since 1990. I use the one true quoting style when responding to emails, dating back to at least the earliest days of Usenet. It allows people to carry on a conversation in email.

Hello Kodos, I'm glad things are going well on Rigel 4. Thanks for writing back, wanted to answer a few specific things.

>The thing I miss most about Earth is tasty human flesh.
No problem, I know just the source. They are extra plump in the place known as Uh-mare-e-kuh.

>>I'm concerned about Kang. His antennae look sick.
>Why? What's wrong with his antennae?
Don't you think they're an unhealthy shade of green?

Reading this snippet it's easy to see the conversation. Previous relevant text is succinctly quoted with >, you can chain the > to indicate history. This style is so ingrained in the Internet culture I'm amazed to find myself explaining it.

But it's disappearing. I frequently get emails from people now who don't understand it. They gamely try to follow my style by writing a full reply on top of my email, or inventing their own mechanisms like replying in ALL CAPS or inserting random other markup. I'm not surprised when non-tech people have trouble with email quoting. Frankly I'm glad my lawyer is on email at all, so I won't quibble. But lately I've even seen a fair number of Google employees who don't get this, either. We're supposed to be the most savvy of the net savvy!

Part of the issue is cultural dilution: you can't increase the Net population 10,000x and expect the culture to stay the same. I also think it's technological. Outlook, Gmail, etc all encourage bottom quoting by starting you out in an email reply with the original message below where you're typing. Wrong choice. And modern email technology often does away with the notion of line breaks entirely, making the line-oriented > quoting mechanism fail.

We need to find something that works for everyone.

math owie was on this issue back in 2001.

culture
2005-08-09 17:22 Z


Mastodon @nelson@tech.lgbt Linkblog Wed 2024-04-24 TreeLink.us SunPower big problems Intel's new NPU Tue 2024-04-23 Awesome Balatro Tracker Beeper Android Biometrics Fri 2024-04-19 Balatro Immolate Turning Point voting fraud Thu 2024-04-18 Bicycles of World War II AI-ese Mon 2024-04-15 Butterick’s Practical Typography Wicked Bible Sat 2024-04-13 Normalization of Jan 6 Followgraph for Mastodon South Yuba Canal Fri 2024-04-12 Waffle House order marking Wed 2024-04-10 Boy Meets Boy Meets Boys’ Love Termux Tue 2024-04-09 Netflitwitter Nigeria’s Scrabble King Search Archives 2023 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2022 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2021 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2020 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2019 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2018 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2017 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2016 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2015 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2014 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2013 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2012 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2011 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2010 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2009 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2008 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2007 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2006 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2005 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2004 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2003 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2002 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2001 12 11 10 09 08 07 One good site MDN Nelson Minar nelson@monkey.org Blog licensed under a Creative Commons License		The lost art of email conversation I've been emailing on the Internet since 1990. I use the one true quoting style when responding to emails, dating back to at least the earliest days of Usenet. It allows people to carry on a conversation in email. Hello Kodos, I'm glad things are going well on Rigel 4. Thanks for writing back, wanted to answer a few specific things. >The thing I miss most about Earth is tasty human flesh. No problem, I know just the source. They are extra plump in the place known as Uh-mare-e-kuh. >>I'm concerned about Kang. His antennae look sick. >Why? What's wrong with his antennae? Don't you think they're an unhealthy shade of green? Reading this snippet it's easy to see the conversation. Previous relevant text is succinctly quoted with >, you can chain the > to indicate history. This style is so ingrained in the Internet culture I'm amazed to find myself explaining it. But it's disappearing. I frequently get emails from people now who don't understand it. They gamely try to follow my style by writing a full reply on top of my email, or inventing their own mechanisms like replying in ALL CAPS or inserting random other markup. I'm not surprised when non-tech people have trouble with email quoting. Frankly I'm glad my lawyer is on email at all, so I won't quibble. But lately I've even seen a fair number of Google employees who don't get this, either. We're supposed to be the most savvy of the net savvy! Part of the issue is cultural dilution: you can't increase the Net population 10,000x and expect the culture to stay the same. I also think it's technological. Outlook, Gmail, etc all encourage bottom quoting by starting you out in an email reply with the original message below where you're typing. Wrong choice. And modern email technology often does away with the notion of line breaks entirely, making the line-oriented > quoting mechanism fail. We need to find something that works for everyone. math owie was on this issue back in 2001. culture 2005-08-09 17:22 Z Nelson's Weblog • culture → blogs, books, design, food, games, movies, music, olympics, processing, travel, tv